going through and downloading images this evening. I noticed something rather
strange about this one.
Zoom in on it. Why is there data missing from most of the crater rims?
another example. In
light of everything, it seems rather dubious. It’s probably nothing.
begin?? I downloaded the following image from this website. What does the
crowd want to see?!
what I found! Happy Halloween J
10/31/05 Part 1 (N,S,E,W)
10/31/05 Part 2 (22.5 x 4)
10/31/05 Part 3 (33.3. x 4)
This is new from ASU.
can believe it, go here
to see which image this set up and slide show is from:
last series ended in three parts, I’ll just pick this one up @ 10/30/05 Part 4
10/30/05 Part 4 (N,S,E,W)
10/30/05 Part 5 (22.5 x 2)
crater, any crater….
are down 14-0 in the first… here’s the set up and a link to the original image: J
image is E/W. Sorry, I didn’t feel like doing the full set with this one.
much for cleaning up the presentation. I picked another amazing example of
Mars’ artificial landscape from ASU’s
the show. (This entire series fit nicely into 3 parts)
10/30/05 Part 1 (N,S,E,W)
10/30/05 Part 2 (22.5 x 4)
10/30/05 Part 3 (33.3 x 4)
another slide show using this image and this setup. Aesthetically speaking, the
overall design of Mars’ artificial landscape allows for considerable error
while doing the mirroring. Symbolically speaking, it seems to matter very much
where the exact center is. That said, here is the image and the setup I used. I
show the crater then a blow up of the tiny crater that is in the center.
Sorry the red lines are so faint. There’s
still a lot I need to learn about Photoshop J
the first slide show: 10/29/05
said that, I’ve revisited the series dated 10/25/05. I’m questioning the axis
of symmetry I used. I also failed to show my set up, so here it is.
image is where I now think it should go, and why.
Notice the North line runs tangent to the two
big craters and exactly bisects the tiny one at the top of the image.
Then I went
back to ESA
to see what else I might find. Their website is down… I wonder if I have
anything to do with that? J
So I went
here instead and nabbed this little goodie
to play with.
Stay tuned for the rest of the show! J
10/29/05 Part 1 (N,S,E,W)
10/29/05 Part 2 (22.5 x 2)
10/29/05 Part 3 (22.5 x 2)
10/29/05 Part 4 (33.3 x 2)
10/29/05 Part 5 (33.3 x 2)
went back for one more.
the setup. Since it is my second set of the day, I will just call it 10/29/05
Parts 6 – 10.
10/29/05 Part 6 (N,S,E,W)
10/29/05 Part 7 (22.5 x 2)
10/29/05 Part 8 (22.5 x 2)
10/29/05 Part 9 (33.3 x 2)
10/29/05 Part 10 (33.3 x 2)
has become a mess. I have all weekend to work on it…. Or do I? J
an image of NASA’s suspicious example of pareidolia with the lines of symmetry
placed where I believe they ought to be placed. It appears the artificial art
craters, (for lack of a better word) have an alignment system of their own. If
it’s linear, bisect it. If it’s a crater, run the lines tangent to it. It’s
just that simple.
the setup I used for the Happy Show.
the finale for 10/26/05.
10/26/05 Part 4 (33.3 x 4)
CORRECTION TO 10/24/05!!!
Knife self corrects once again… heheheh ;)
The Happy Show, Part 1 (n,s,e,w)
The Happy Show, Part 2 (22.5 x 2)
The Happy Show, Part 3 (22.5 x 2)
The Happy Show, Part 4 (33.3 x 2)
The Happy Show, Part 5 (33.3 x 2)
the N,S,E,W gallery which was previewed in yesterday’s post.
10/26/05 Part 1 (n,s,e,w)
10/26/05 Part 2 (22.5 x 2)
10/26/05 Part 3 (22.5 x2)
10/26/05 Part 4 (33.3 x 4)
wait to get started on this tomorrow! J
here’s one to keep you all warm until tomorrow J
felt like going back to ESA.
the image I’m using
set 1. It includes both mirrors from North/South & East/West.
10/25/05 Part 1
10/25/05 Part 2 (all 4 pairs of 33.3. ~110
10/25/05 Part 3 (1st pair of 22.5)
10/25/05 Part 4 (2nd pair of 22.5)
I said, why not?
interested parties will remember this little slap in the face.
here’s a little slap, right back at ‘em J
10/24/05 Part 1
everyone’s clear. There were no cardinal alignment notes on the original
NASA image. I had to apply what I’ve learned so far during my adventure.
I’ve noticed over the past month or two, that every crater has marks that are
there to help guide you. All I had to do was look for marks that bisect the
‘crater’, extend a line that uses the marks, and begin mirroring.
tell you at this moment what line it is that I use in the above slide show.
What I can do is predict that I’ve found one of the
meaningful alignment lines, i.e., N/S, E/W, 22.5, 33.3.
would be willing to ‘bet the farm’ and say that the line I’ve drawn and used to
do the slide show is +/- x degrees from one of them.
N,S,E,W are the image’s border, one can do this…
that looks right to me…. North mirror….
above cardinal lines are accurate, my original guess is about 18.6 degrees off
East. That may or may not be significant. That number came up frequently while
I was doing my reconstructive geometry. Turns out 18.6 is about .865 degrees
away from 19.5.
I will be
working on the slide show tonight. J
time, I only did the big picture and showed it one way. Here are all twenty:
10/24/05 Big Picture
After a couple
of days of relaxing, I sat down and realized that I have accurate N/S, E/W,
22.5 & 33.3 lines that are as accurate as the data that ESA has given on
the image data.
the first sets. It doesn’t get any better than this, folks. J
10/23/05 Part 1
10/23/05 Part 2
10/23/05 Part 3
10/23/05 Part 4
10/26/05 Part 5 (4 complete sets of 22.5 off
As promised + more J
(I’m only showing these in one direction. The images are
huge and doing so will save me considerable time while working w/ this ESA
10/21/05 Part 7
10/21/05 Part 6
10/21/05 Part 5
10/21/05 Part 4
10/21/05 Part 3
10/21/05 Part 2
10/21/05 Part 1
10/20/05 ( To be clear, this
is the image I’m working with today. It can be found here)
I will be
starting tomorrow’s efforts with this
another one using east/west. I only mirrored one side.
10/20/05 Part 4
scratch what I wrote below. I think I have something to work with…. The given
line at the bottom of the ESA image
can be traced and extended. J
slide show is my first effort w/ a seemingly accurate north line.
10/20/05 Part 3
not measured these ESA images. I simply applied my emerging ‘Marked Crater Theory’.
I need to find a way to verify how close I am to true north. I’ll have to see
if I can verify whether or not the north line that is given in the bottom
margin of the image is accurate. At the moment, I have no idea.
words, I’m not sure whether or not the lines I’ve used are even remotely
accurate. What I am sure of at the moment is I see a hexagon and another
‘phoenix’. Remember when I goofed the first hidden pentagon I found? The
pentagon was still obvious even though my alignment was slightly off.
10/20/05 Part 2
So then I
decided to go out and test my crater theory on a certain ESA image….
see the following slide show for the results.
10/20/05 Part 1
unreal. It’s my first try since last night. ~~~Max shakes his head,
the mosaic for the time being J
downloaded a few swaths from ASU’s
10/18/05 Part 1
10/18/05 Part 2
10/16/05 Part 1
10/16/05 Part 2
pair of the 33.3 set, I get to refer you to a pair from a previous set J
this be, you say?
already did that pair yesterday, 10/15/05 Part 4!
10/16/05 Part 3 (see 10/15/05
Part 4 for other pair of mirrors)
Begin sets of Cydonia
symmetry image galleries
10/15/05 Part 1 (Should’ve done this set
a long time ago)
10/15/05 Part 2
10/15/05 Part 3
10/15/05 Part 4
10/15/05 Part 5
What does it mean?! So many
combinations to try!
I mirrored this 1st image just like one should mirror the FOM to
get the hidden sphinx. I used my given N/S line and placed it over each
feature’s ‘crater’ . I then mirrored
the western side.
Here are some other random
mirrors from this area. When I say ‘random’, everyone should understand that
every single crater seems to produce something significant. The image directly
above was done with a 33.3, counter clockwise, off North line. That’s the same line Richard Hoagland used
when he originally proposed that the FOM is actually a sphinx some 15 years
Here is a short gallery. I’m
not doing full sets at the moment. I’m looking for ‘craters’ located nearby key
features and doing whatever sets seem to come in contact with the landform.
Click on the image below for a
short slide show of close-ups. I used 33.3, clockwise, off North.
Post date: 10/14/05 (part 1)
Ok, ok… here’s one more quick
slide show before the weekly card game! 10/14/05
Well, I lost at Texas Hold ‘em
but here’s another set I worked real quick before bed using 22.5, counter
clockwise, off East. 10/14/05 Part 3
About the above slide show…. I
must say it’s my favorite so far. At this point, I’m just throwin’ darts and I
think the above is definitely a ‘bullseye’.
Part 6 (It’s hard to keep track… this is all of them J
10/09/05 Part 4
1: Eureka! (
6th set of the day…. Wow, that was a really cool idea!
09/30/05 Cydonia Mirror images (rather than redo this slide show, I
adjusted and corrected a couple of the images in part 5)
PART 2… YOU WON’T BELIEVE YOUR EYES. 09/30/05
PART 3…. IT JUST KEEPS GETTING BETTER. 09/30/05 (no wonder, look at the
date and numbers I’ve assigned the images)
PART 4…. I SAVED THE BEST FOR LAST. 09/30/05
PART 5…. ENJOY THESE WHILE I FINISH THE REST TODAY, 10/01/05 (minor
adjustments to part 1 images added here)
PART 6…. I THINK THERE ARE STILL MORE TO COME, 10/01/05
PART 7…. UNLESS I NEED TO DO 19.5 * 8 OFF N/S & E/W, THIS IS ALL OF THEM.
NEW Face on Mars Gallery
Updated 09/30/05 to include older mirrors + 19.5 off E/W & N/S
Hidden Sphinx explanation page
My very first image gallery of Cydonia
My second image gallery of Cydonia
Gallery….about 15 images in here.
Gallery… This one’s my favorite so far….
Gallery… Some wild symbols in this one….
Gallery…. 50+ images….
Gallery, Part 2
Click here for my Face on Mars mirror slide
here for FOM analysis
Click here for FOM 33.3 mirror analysis
Click here for FOM 22.5 mirror
Click here for FOM N/S mirror
MaxTheKnife’s Photo Gallery 1
76 Data Geometry Photo Gallery 1
MTK’s Humble Beginning Gallery
A word about sacred geometry
out my developing online store.
What really got me
started on this epic project was my participation in two online forums. The
Enterprise mission, which is private ($3.95 p/mo) and Space.com.
I cannot list threads to
TEM’s forum because it’s private, however here’s a list of great threads I’ve
participated in at SDC. It’s been
educational and inspiring to say the least.
at Cydonia (My first thread)
Are So Cool! (Zen’s thread! A must read!
Hopefully, I’ll be able to inspire my good friend Zen to provide some
words to supply extra context from his point of view. He really deserves
special mention here. Zen, as I have come to know him, has an amazing online
presence. He has a knack for eloquence and a flare for profundity. Things would
have turned out much differently if it wasn’t for ZenOnMars. Thanks, Zen. Good luck with your new Blog!
on Mars, part 4. (This is the thread that ultimately inspired my website)
article: Iapetus artificial construct! (This is the thread that inspired me
to join SDC)
on Mars, Part 1
on Mars, Part 2
on Mars, Part 3
on Mars, Part 4 (2nd time I’ve linked this)
on Mars, Part 5
about Cydonia Part 2
built the pyramids?
I will eventually find
time to develop a page on my website to Sunken Pyramids, and other megalithic
Earth ruins. Understanding Cydonia may be just a few meters under water…..or
under the Sphinx’s front paws! One
should definitely check out Professor
Masaaki Kimura’s evidence from Yonaguni, Japan courtesy of the Morien
Until I do create the
sunken pyramid section, here are some other wonderful websites that are
Dr. Tom Van
Dr. Mark Carlotto
The two links below are
original pages that I had posted before I realized the key to the puzzle.
PLEASE CONTINUE (The rest of my website is
very undeveloped and needs lots of editing. The best stuff is in the list of
links to follow)
to old Page 2
to old Page 3